For Christmas I got an interesting present from a pal - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and really amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no family pets). And suvenir51.ru there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, because pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can buy any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, produced by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He hopes to broaden his range, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, sciencewiki.science you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we really imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for creative functions should be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without permission need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective but let's build it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize creators' material on the web to help develop their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of happiness," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest carrying out industries on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A government representative said: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to help them accredit their content, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a nationwide data library consisting of public data from a wide variety of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, king-wifi.win to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to desire the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its technology for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, disgaeawiki.info and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts because it's so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm uncertain for how long I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.